Video 2: Video 11. Classroom Case Studies (Grades 3-5)
Summary: This video focuses more on content than anything else. It talks about taking students from concrete mathematics into algebraic thinking, and how this type of thinking can be introduced in the early grades. While the video focuses on cultivating this type of thinking, there are a number of other aspects to pick up on, mainly demonstrating knowledge, teacher's focus on process, and student engagement.
In the
elementary setting, students demonstrate their knowledge in a few different
ways. The teacher checked for
understanding by circling during the lesson when students were talking with
their groups. She supported their
discussion and slowed them down, focusing on the idea of doing and
undoing. She walked them through the
concept further, mimicking how you would wrap and then unwrap a present. She did this for the whole class with a
couple of examples, both checking their ideas and helping explain them for the
whole class (or having a student do this).
There was one time shown during the video when she checked in with
students as a whole group. She asked,
“Does everyone think they have a good idea of things that can be done and
undone?” This was more a question about
confidence than knowledge, seeing if the students felt good about the concept
rather than asking them a question with a right or wrong answer. I think this is something I would like to get
more in the practice of, just to gain an understanding of where my students are
with the lesson. I’ve done this some
using a “thumbs up/down/in between”, and it gives me a good idea of whether or
not we’re ready to move on. There is one
concern with it: what about students who simply agree to not be seen as the
‘stupid kid’? I think that, even if
there are some who do this, checking in about confidence is just as important
as actual content.
Another
thing I noticed about the lesson was the emphasis the teacher put on
process. This is something I think is
very important. At one point, the
teacher asked how the student would get from the ‘out’ and find the starting
number. The student gave the answer, and the teacher took this opportunity to
have him and another student explain how this answer was gotten. While still appreciating the student’s
answer, she gave a small bit of praise, but put much more emphasis on
process. This is also something I’d like
to incorporate in my teaching. This is
something I think I do a bit already, but I’d like it to be a strong aspect of
my teaching.
In this
video, student engagement was high. I
enjoyed watching a lesson like this because it was something that was
‘normal’. By this, I mean that the
lesson wasn’t high activity, which sometimes leads to off task behavior, but
was still direct instruction that the students were interested in. I’m not quite certain from the video what
this was a result of, and do not know the class (and also could not see all
students). I think part of it was due to
the initial question: what can be done and then undone? This is something students can relate to, and
can think of countless examples in their own lives. Having this background was a strong connector
for the lesson and helped students grasp the concept. This shows me how important and helpful
anticipatory sets can be, and how they can bring the lesson, and student engagement
and understanding, to the next level.
The last
thing from the video I focused on was the attitude of the teachers shown in the
movie, especially at the beginning. They
were discussing how important math is at a young level, and how it can prepare
students for math at a higher level. One
teacher was talking about how she had been teaching algebraic thinking without
even realizing it. It seemed like the
teachers were realizing how important math is, even in the younger grades. It sometimes seems like math is a priority
only because of standardized testing and test scores, and it was encouraging to
hear these teachers talk about preparing students for higher levels of
math.
Next week, I will continue with observations. In tomorrow's post, however, I will comment on the importance of developing individual relationships with students. A few things from last week got me thinking about this, and it is something I've been wanting to focus a post on. Tomorrow in school I will make a point of doing some one-on-one work with students other than my case studies to begin developing more relationships and seeing how students change when they are out of the group.
This question was a little more difficult. My teacher moved from Texas many years ago, and the professionals she speaks to outside the school were her previous colleagues from her old school. She does not speak to them anymore, but they were a support for her in her early years in Minnesota. She also discussed that when she moved schools in Texas, she spoke to the people she used to teach with for a long time, especially about the new practices in her new school and how things were changing at the old school. She also mentioned Pintrest as a resource. She posts on there, and having other teachers comment on her posts or repost her items is a source of communication outside of the building. I asked if she speaks to other professionals in the building outside of school, and she mentioned talking to the other third grade teacher sometimes. I am now wondering if this has changed some as her career has advanced. I feel like I will still contact my colleagues from St. Kate's in my early years of teaching, yet that might decrease as I get more involved in the school I teach at and get to know those professionals better.
Question of the Day
Is there anyone who is not a staff member (contact outside the school) who you regularly reference for collaboration?This question was a little more difficult. My teacher moved from Texas many years ago, and the professionals she speaks to outside the school were her previous colleagues from her old school. She does not speak to them anymore, but they were a support for her in her early years in Minnesota. She also discussed that when she moved schools in Texas, she spoke to the people she used to teach with for a long time, especially about the new practices in her new school and how things were changing at the old school. She also mentioned Pintrest as a resource. She posts on there, and having other teachers comment on her posts or repost her items is a source of communication outside of the building. I asked if she speaks to other professionals in the building outside of school, and she mentioned talking to the other third grade teacher sometimes. I am now wondering if this has changed some as her career has advanced. I feel like I will still contact my colleagues from St. Kate's in my early years of teaching, yet that might decrease as I get more involved in the school I teach at and get to know those professionals better.
Question of the day: I asked if my teacher talked to any other professionals outside the building about her students or teaching.
ReplyDeleteThis question was a little more difficult. My teacher moved from Texas many years ago, and the professionals she speaks to outside the school were her previous colleagues from her old school. She does not speak to them anymore, but they were a support for her in her early years in Minnesota. She also discussed that when she moved schools in Texas, she spoke to the people she used to teach with for a long time, especially about the new practices in her new school and how things were changing at the old school. She also mentioned Pintrest as a resource. She posts on there, and having other teachers comment on her posts or repost her items is a source of communication outside of the building. I asked if she speaks to other professionals in the building outside of school, and she mentioned talking to the other third grade teacher sometimes. I am now wondering if this has changed some as her career has advanced. I feel like I will still contact my colleagues from St. Kate's in my early years of teaching, yet that might decrease as I get more involved in the school I teach at and get to know those professionals better.
A few things:
DeleteFirst, put the title of the video at the top of your reflection, along with a brief summary of the big picture to give me context. This is more convenient for me that going back and forth between your action plan and your blog.
Second, checking for understanding is a tricky business--especially the formative kind. When kids give a thumb's up/down/sideways, how do they know they get it? What's their evidence? Of course, some kids will protect themselves by always giving a thumb's up, as you noted. The key is, if a teacher is checking for understanding, she needs to insist on evidence of understanding. Of equal importance is a plan for following up with kids who do get it, don't get it, and kind of get it. If you're just getting a status of the class and not following through, what's the point.
Third, your focus on process as part of the "effective checking for understanding" formula is smart. You were conscientious about this in Mr. Abenth's room, and my coaching notes reflect numerous instances when you asked for more than an answer, but how a child got the answer. I can see why you noticed this same practice in the video. You can follow up the check in (thumbs up/down or whatever strategy you use) with this question, "How do you know you get it?" That's a focus on process, and it keeps the kids (and you) accountable.
Fourth, please make a new post for writing about your question of the day. If I'm not looking at your blog carefully, I might miss the fact that you've posted a comment, which is actually new content. Make sense?
Thanks for these thorough and thoughtful daily reflections. It's interesting for me to see what's interesting to you.
I added my question of the day at the end of the body of the post, just to follow the layout of my daily postings. I think the question "how do you know you get it?" is a very valuable thing to ask. I remember talking in class about students becoming aware of their learning, how they learn best, etc., and this definitely reinforces that, my belief on supporting process, and shows me that they actually understand.
ReplyDelete